Refine filtered results
Showing results 1 - 10 of 14
-
Research Staff Forum
Practice No. 1263
Last modified: 17/06/2011 14:06:00
Institution: University of Strathclyde
In March 2011 the first Research Staff Development Forum was hosted by the University’s extended Researcher Development Team: Research and Knowledge Exchange Services, HR, the Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement (CAPLE), and the Careers Service. This event was aimed at all Strathclyde research staff and provided opportunities for sharing thoughts and concerns, finding out about institutional and national developments, as well as networking with other members of the research community.
-
Writing Winning Research Proposals (workshop)
Practice No. 1261
Last modified: 17/06/2011 14:05:11
Institution: University of Strathclyde
This is a two day workshop during which a series of talks by successful grant applicants illustrate the range of research that is supported by the different research councils, as well as offering insights into the world of EU funded projects. Participants develop their own research proposals in advance of day 2 and then work in small interdisciplinary groups (mock panels) to review and evaluate each other’s proposals.
-
GRADnews
Practice No. 1256
Last modified: 17/06/2011 10:47:12
Institution: University of Strathclyde
GRADnews is a monthly e-newsletter aimed at postgraduate research students within the university and features information on a wealth of internal and external career-development related opportunities available to the community.
-
Fund for Researcher-Led Initiatives
Practice No. 585
Last modified: 22/03/2011 16:10:13
Institution: University of Edinburgh
The University has set up a fund to support local training initiatives led by researchers (PhD students and research staff) themselves. This Researcher-Led Fund is available for specific projects/activities/events initiated by research students or research staff for the benefit of groups of researchers at a School, research unit or research group level. -
Researcher Development Framework
Practice No. 812
Last modified: 10/03/2011 09:49:40
Institution: University of Stirling
A Researcher Development Framework has been produced by the Researcher Task Group at the University of Stirling to assist researchers to make decisions regarding their personal, professional and career development opportunities. -
An interview with a researcher (information literacy)
Practice No. 1157
Last modified: 29/09/2010 11:16:16
Institution: Research Information Network, Glasgow Caledonian University
We provide a series of 3 consecutive workshops for new PhD students and for university staff who are embarking on a PhD. The 3 workshops cover an introduction to literature reviews (1), sources and searching tips for effective use of electronic resources and strategies for keeping up-to-date (2) and managing your citations using Refworks (3). All sessions are interactive and last for 2.5-3 hours. They are deliberately informal and use a mix of presentation and activities to encourage participation. An aspect of the workshops is to help create a community of scholars so we include activities in which the participants work together. The workshops are facilitated by 2 subject librarians, and in one of them with an academic colleague also. The first workshop is seminar-based. We interview an experienced researcher about their approach to literature reviews, to contextualise the literature review within the PhD process, and to provide best advice on how to go about it. The second workshop addresses the next step of identifying information sources and resource discovery tools to support research. It is a hand-on session in a computer lab which combines a presentation on searching techniques with a hands-on session for participants. The third workshop is a lab-based session on using Refworks to manage references and bibliographies. -
Making an impact with your PhD
Practice No. 1112
Last modified: 29/07/2010 10:55:27
Institution: University of Glasgow
Glasgow’s researcher development initiative aims to develop and support a vibrant community of researchers who can participate in meaningful engagement with researchers from other fields, policy makers, the wider public, and the local community and business sector. This has been achieved through our flagship ‘Making an Impact’ event which connects researcher training with opportunities to put what has been learnt into practice in real scenarios. ‘Making an Impact’ ran 3 times in the last academic year and was well attended by early-career researchers from all disciplines, as well as prospective PhD students. The overarching aim of the event was to help researchers to consider how their research and how they as researchers can have an impact on the local community, Government policy or the economy. Each event had two distinct sections as well as networking opportunities: Part A: Presentations from PhD alumni These were designed to help participants consider the wide range of career opportunities open to them and identify possible routes into these. Many speakers brought examples of how they are continuing to work closely with academia, thus enabling researchers to understand how their research could be used to inform work in museums, policy, social enterprise and spin-outs. These talks have cemented relationships between local organisations and the University. For example, discussions are now underway between a current research student in Adult Education and one of the Social Enterprise speakers about possible research collaboration. Following the presentation from a representative of Glasgow museums, a current researcher was invited to visit and meet curatorial staff to help clarify her career goals. Part B: Presentations from current research students Current researchers presented their work, considering how best to convey its value and interest to an audience outside of their own field (including the external speakers). Pitching their talk at the correct ‘level’ was particularly challenging for many students but they appreciated having an ‘outsider’ perspective as well as finding out about research methods and practice in other fields and areas where they might collaborate or learn from each other. -
How to write a successful research article
Practice No. 1091
Last modified: 10/02/2010 14:43:17
Institution: University of Aberdeen
Dr. Kate Macdonald worked for 15 years in academic editing, and now conducts and writes up her own research for publication. She will take you through the processes you need to know to write a successful article based on your own research, and get it published. -
Talking with the Media
Practice No. 1090
Last modified: 10/02/2010 14:23:38
Institution: University of Aberdeen
Participants work on their communications skills in this lively, interactive workshop on "talking to the media". They get the chance to meet staff from our press office and public engagement unit and take part in activities designed to help them understand what makes a good press release, and make them better prepared for interviews about their work. There will also be an opportunity to take away video-casts of mock interviews and discuss ongoing opportunities to take their research to a general audience. -
Developing Critical Thinking & Arguments
Practice No. 1089
Last modified: 10/02/2010 12:25:15
Institution: University of Aberdeen
Outwith academia, an argument usually describes a disagreement between two or more people. It tends to be an event; a physical occurrence. This may be the sense of the word that is most familiar to you, but an academic argument describes something quite different. It is essentially a point of view. The heart of academic argument is persuasion, and the structure of your argument plays a vital role in this. To persuade, you must set the stage, provide a context, and decide how to reveal your evidence. An academic argument is a formal argument constructed according to the specific conventions of the academic discipline in which it is presented. However, some things are common to all academic arguments: The claim must be arguable: A disagreement or a number of legitimate points of view must exist regarding the claim. The argument must be rational: An argument must be based in fact not emotion. The claim must be meticulously considered, the evidence thoroughly researched and carefully selected. The logic must be cohesive: A claim must be argued linearly, step-by-step, with appropriate transitions revealing the logic that ties one point to the next. This course is designed to be an introduction or refresher to some of the concepts of Critical Thinking and Argument.



