• About us
  • Contact us
  • Search

You are not logged in:

 

DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO DOCTORAL SUPERVISION

 


Place one tick in a box on each line to indicate the level of importance you attach to that item.

Unimportant     Important

1

2

3

4

5

  1. I always arrange a date for the next meeting before we finish the current one

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. My research students learn quickly to embody the ethical principles and practices of this discipline

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. I want my students to think critically, always to recognise flaws in articles, arguments or work that they see

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. It is important that my students question themselves and understand why they are doing this research

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. My students can manage their own and others emotions appropriately

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. I keep copies of records of each meeting with my student

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. I feel disappointed if my students leave the discipline

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. I want my students to demonstrate an independence of mind

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. My students are transformed personally by the work they are doing

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. I enjoy being with my research students

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. The student has to send me something to read before I will meet with them, to demonstrate they are making progress

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. It is important that my students understand the work of key researchers in my field

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. It is important to me that students can put forward counter-arguments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. My students go through a ‘dark night of the soul' whilst doing their research, but emerge stronger for it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. It is important that my students maintain positive working relationships with colleagues and help them as required.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. I note in my diary key dates for annual reports etc, so I can monitor progress

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. I frequently show examples of interesting and excellent work in my field to my students

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. Successful students are able to think in a broad or interdisciplinary way

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. My students learn to reframe the important questions

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. My students enthuse others with their interest in their work.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scoring your profile

 

Add the scores up for the following numbers, and it will give you some idea of your priorities as a supervisor:

 

Question number

Score

1

 

6

 

11

 

16

 

Total:      Functional Score

 

 

Question number

Score

2

 

7

 

12

 

17

 

Total: Enculturation Score

 

 

Question number

Score

3

 

8

 

13

 

18

 

Total: Critical Thinking Score

 

 

Question number

Score

4

 

9

 

14

 

19

 

Total:     Emancipation Score

 

Question number

Score

5

 

10

 

15

 

20

 

Total: Relationships Score

 

 

Understanding your score

This brief questionnaire is designed to help you look at your priorities and understand a little more about each of the conceptual approaches to supervision.  It is not (yet) a validated instrument.

A common pattern is for supervisors initially to feel competent in or to seek competence in one or two of the approaches.  As time moves on they extend their interests into discovering the effects using some of the other approaches with their students.  If there is another pattern, it might be for supervisors to move from enculturation to emancipation over time.  It may be that mastery of enculturation (the supervisor is confident in their ability to successfully induct their research student into the disciplinary way of thinking) frees the supervisor to feel confident in then setting the student free to explore their potential (emancipation).

 

Further information on the approaches is available at

Lee A (forthcoming 2008)  Supervision Teams: making them work.  London. Society for Research into Higher Education ISBN 978-0-946376-13-1

Lee A (forthcoming 2009)  Helping New Postgraduates:  A Guide for Academics. Maidenhead. Open University and McGraw Hill  ISBN 9780335235582

Lee, A (2008)  How are doctoral students supervised?  Concepts of research supervision.  Studies in Higher Education  33 (4)

Lee, A (2008) Quis custodiet? Who helps the research supervisors? Proceedings at the 2nd International Conference on Preparing for Academic Practice: Disciplinary Perspectives, University of Oxford 8-9 April

Lee, A. (2007). Developing Effective Supervisors' Concepts of Research Supervision. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21 (4) 680-693