Breadcrumbs
- Home
- Research staff
- Research staff blog
- Link shorteners, phishing, and spying on your visitors
Link shorteners, phishing, and spying on your visitors
15 May 2010
By Hannah Dee
This post is in part a follow-on from Chris Thompson's earlier one advising the use of bit.ly for URLs. In emails, link shorteners make sense sometimes. And on micro-blogging sites (e.g. twitter) which restrict the number of characters you can use, it's pretty much necessary. But it's also a problem: "phishing" scams often involve redirecting the user to a website that looks like a target site (e.g. Facebook, ebay, or more dangerously, a bank) and then persuading you to enter your password. One of the main ways you can spot that you're being "phished" is by looking at the URL, and if the URL is obscured by a shortener this safeguard is removed (see here for a cautionary tale involving the famous geek and science fiction author Cory Doctorow, showing that even the most tech-savvy nerd can get phished). The basic problem is that following a link that looks like ebay.scammysitename.com is stupidity; but following a link that looks like tinyurl.com/aE$ds has now become normal. And we've got to be more careful with our passwords as a result.
But what if you want to spy on your website visitors? Well, there are alternatives, and the leader of the market at the moment is Google Analytics. This is not much use if you're just passing links around, but if you're building a website or even just a single webpage an Analytics account (they're free) can really help you work out who's coming to your site.
It'll tell you:
- Where they are from geographically (this is usually accurate to the nearest city or large town, unless people are using a proxy)
- How long they stayed and what pages they looked at each visit
- Whether they're return visitors or new visitors (this is less accurate for those using dynamic IP addressing)
- How they found your site (e.g. Did they come by search engine or link? If it was search engine, what search terms did they use?)
- And it'll give you graphs of access over time (so you can see any unusual patterns - there was a definite spike in the traffic to my largely unread personal blog when my Ada Lovelace Day post got linked from New Scientist!)




Chris Thomson17 May 2010 at 08:04 AM
permalinkreport this comment
I'd not thought about setting up a publications page complete with analytics. I can see that being a very useful tool to seeing what departments maybe a good match for your work, and therefore worth applying too. Its defiantly something I'll be working on now.