• About us
  • Contact us
  • Search

You are not logged in:

21 May 2010

By Tennie Videler

I am on the train on the way back from a meeting with representatives of research staff associations from Scottish  and Northern Irish universities in Edinburgh. It was wonderful to spend the day with such a driven bunch of individuals. We discussed some of the main issues people focus on as staff associations and what some of the common hurdles in running them are.

Most research staff associations combine organising social events and representation in university committees (which incidentally plays havoc with my classification in the RS communities listing which distinguishes between social and represntational..). The issues taken up include:

  • Research staff being proactive about your own career. RS associations have taken a lead on the introduction of staff development/ career reviews
  • Implementation of the Concordat for the career development of researchers
  • Recognition of teaching by research staff
  • Organisation of careers days
  • Organisation of social events to promote integration of research staff

We discussed the relative advantages of small and large committees: for examplemeetings not as long for the former, sharing out of the workload and larger effective network for the latter. 

We talked about strategies on how to engage research staff, overcome apathy and make sure you are working from a mandate. Everyone agreed that making logistics as easy as possible was crucial. This was seen as the reason for many single subject/ discipline associations, which tend to boil down to a single building.

We decided it was crucial to identify a staff champion, usually someone in staff or researcher development, which would help to raise funding. But such a champion is also important for continuity, as high turnover is inherent in the employment of research staff.

We also had a chat about what everyone gets out of the role they play.

We went through some of the different models of setting up research staff associations.  With the UKRSA we are planning to put together a guide on how to set up a research staff association using the different models, with that in mind it would be useful to know:

  • Are you part of a research staff association?
  • How is it set up?
  • Do you have a webpage I could put in the RS communities listing?

Then we wondered why there were so many biologists in the room? Are biologists over represented? If so, why are they more inclined to be active in these sort of associations?

 

 

Comments Subscribe by RSS

  1. Sarah Davies23 May 2010 at 05:46 PM

    Is it do with numbers? - As in, are there simply more biology/medical sciences research positions around and therefore more biologists filling them?

  2. Tennie Videler24 May 2010 at 10:52 AM

    I have made some changes to this post as David Proctor pointed out that there were not only biologists in the room and that David Foley from Queens in Belfast was there too. Sarah, yes, there are a lot of biologists, but also a lot of other physical science people. And obviously, the sample size was way too small to draw any conclusions. But I thought we might all enjoy a banter about it until you or Hannah come up with another fab theory!

Please log in to post a comment.

Have your say

You need to be a registered user to join the discussion. Once you're logged in you'll be able to Create an article and Comment on existing articles
Sign up or login to get started

Latest activity

" I have made some changes to this post as David Proctor pointed out that there were not only biologists in the room and that David Foley fr..."

Tennie Videler - over a year ago

Read More Comments