• About us
  • Contact us
  • Search

You are not logged in:

08 September 2010

By Sarah Davies

As promised, I wanted to feed back some (personal) highlights from the Vitae Researcher Development Conference. (The emphasis here is on personal: there were hundreds of people at the conference, and tens of sessions, so I’m very aware that my experience has only scraped the surface.) Here are some moments and comments from this gathering of the great and the good in research development which have stuck in my mind…

One thing was a sense – which I must admit was new to me – of how far the UK has come and, actually, how good we are at supporting researchers. Barbara Evans, speaking in the conference’s first plenary, emphasised that Vitae (and related activities) sets the best practice benchmark for the rest of the world. The Roberts Report and the funding which flowed from it enabled enormous strides to be made in setting up structures to train and develop postgraduates and research staff; Rick Rylance made a similar point in the same session when he described how different current practice is from the haphazard system of “patronage and good fortune” which previously existed. However chaotic individual experiences of the research process are, it seems that as a whole UK research has come a long way in a short period.

I was also struck both by the number of people present and the richness and diversity of experience contained within those people. There were, as I have said, hundreds of attendees, all – that I encountered – intelligent, thoughtful, and (perhaps most to the point) passionate about supporting research students and staff. Everything from social enterprise to auto-ethnography was showcased as means to better enable that support; but, even more than this immense range of knowledge and expertise, I also had the sense that this was a community which genuinely cared about those it seeks to help – that these were people who had been there, got the t-shirt, and now wanted to encourage others through that process.

Naturally one highlight was hearing the boys from the UKRSA talk about what’s happening at the moment (research on RSAs, their social media-tastic web presence, a conference coming up…). Their workshop aimed to create new connections between those training and supporting research staff and UKRSA activities, and there certainly seemed to be some productive networking going on. I also had lots of conversations with others interested in public engagement and – perhaps the most fun – with people you don’t seek out but end up sitting next to at dinner or over coffee (one woman for whom PhDs seem to run in the family; another whose work was so interesting that I’m going to ask her for a guest post…).

So: a great time. Even the food was good (smoothies for breakfast - mmm). And yet…despite the enthusiasm, the knowledge – despite even that I left excited about everything that is going on and keyed up to get more involved – something, for me, is not quite right. I think this is partly to do with the looming funding cuts: as one participant pointed out, it is not at all clear how many of those attending will have jobs this time next year. But it’s also to do with the repeated discussions (for example here) we have had on this blog about the structure of the academy, the challenges of short-term contracts, and the impossibility of achieving a ‘research career’. These to me are deeply engrained problems which all the support, training and development in the world won’t change (particularly given that – as was noted at the conference – the Roberts agenda has done less well at liasing with external employers): they rely not on changes in researchers but in the research councils, universities, and funding bodies. Until those changes start to happen – or at least are discussed and their pros and cons publically aired – too much of the wonderful work that is going on in researcher development feels like re-arranging deckchairs on the Titanic. It’s great to be supported, networked and generally savvy – but if there are no avenues for researchers to research, there’s still an iceberg heading your way.

Comments Subscribe by RSS

  1. David ProctorEdited: 11 September 2010 at 03:17 AM

    Hi Sarah,

    The conference was indeed overwhelming.  It was great to finally meet you!

    I'm happy to hear the UKRSA workshop was a conference highlight for you. We were fortunate to meet a lot of great folks at the conference, and my hope is that the researcher development community will become an increasingly important and active ally in helping us establish a collective voice for all UK research staff.  We'll see how things develop over the period between the Vitae researcher development conference and the Vitae research staff conference on 4 November.

    Forgive me if I take a moment to advertise the Vitae research staff conference to your readers: Hi everyone! Please have a look at the conference website, and if the themes and workshops look interesting to you then do join us.  We'd love to meet all of you!

    Also, to build upon what you've said about our "social media-tastic web presence", let me add that the UKRSA wants to support the development of an online community of researchers by engaging with researchers where they (actually 'you', or 'we') exist online.  We're fortunate to have Tennie and Liz as direct representatives of the UKRSA on this blog, and of course you, Sarah, have kindly mentioned that the UKRSA maintains a presence on other social media sites including Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin, and the Nature Network.  If any readers of this blog use these sites then please stop by and say hello, and if anyone is interested in helping maintain the UKRSA presence on these social media sites then please get in touch.

    Your summary of the conference is on target. I came away with many of the same thoughts about the food (very good), speakers (interesting), workshops (engaging), networking (fascinating people!), and outlook (worrying).  I can't say much about the current financial and political climate as it affects HE and research; I only know what I read, and I can't vote so my influence is in a sense limited.  However, I think it's worth emphasizing that we have an exceedingly talented network of career development professionals serving as champions for researchers: Vitae and the university folks are excellent.  Additionally, the collective voice of the UKRSA continues to develop, and our influence will grow as our network grows.  I'm hopeful that despite looming challenges to research in HE, we'll be able to continue promoting a change in academic culture that will gradually make research careers more accessible.

    Thanks again, Sarah!

  2. David Proctor11 September 2010 at 03:19 AM

    PS "looming challenges"?  Are we textile researchers?  Ahh, language.

Please log in to post a comment.

Have your say

You need to be a registered user to join the discussion. Once you're logged in you'll be able to Create an article and Comment on existing articles
Sign up or login to get started

Latest activity

"PS "looming challenges"?  Are we textile researchers?  Ahh, language...."

David Proctor - over a year ago

Read More Comments