• About us
  • Contact us
  • Search

You are not logged in:

20 June 2012

By Jonathan Branney

I’ve been a little quiet on the What’s Up Doc blog of late and the title of this blog will suggest to you why. When initially starting a PhD at Bournemouth University you register first for an MPhil then, 18 months in (if full-time) you are required to submit an MPhil transfer document, essentially a mini-thesis of what you’ve done so far (10,000). If your work so far is considered of a sufficient standard you are then given a pat on the back and you become ‘properly’ registered for a PhD; if it is nearly good enough you can re-submit, if it looks like you are unlikely to successfully complete what is required for a PhD but deemed to be of reasonable standard you might progress to an MPhil, and if it’s not good enough for that, you are politely shown the door.

When I first registered as a postgrad student I did not like the idea of this at all. It just seemed like a load of extra and unnecessary work on top of an already fast-filling schedule, but now, I am entirely grateful for it. Put simply, I did not fully appreciate what I was getting myself in for until I wrote and (glad to report) successfully defended my MPhil transfer. To put it a different way, it forced me sharply up the learning curve from a Masters to a PhD standard of working, to another level of methodological rigour and critical analysis. Talk about steep learning curve! But now I’m at the top of that curve (another blind summit I suspect really) I can survey the horizon of what remains to be done to get a PhD (the tears in my eyes are because of the wind at this altitude, honest!) with a strong sense of clarity. I can now really see where I need to go, how to get there, and how to plan that this happens successfully. This happened only through this process of doing, and I’m not sure how long this would have taken me if I hadn’t had this initial goal to achieve. This process also means I’ve already got some writing at PhD standard which can be used in the final thesis which will hopefully take away some of the pressures towards the end (who am I kidding?!)

What are your thoughts or experiences of doing an MPhil transfer? Perhaps you are much better organised than me and don’t think this is necessary? Have you found it useful like I have? Are there parallels with a PhD based on publications?

Comments Subscribe by RSS

  1. Tamara KingEdited: 29 August 2012 at 10:37 PM

    Congrats! I can see the benefit in the MPhil transfer but don't think I'd put up with it so graciously :-).  Actually I need to look back on my documents; I have faint recollection that there is some kind of progression stipulation. 

  2. D ShottonEdited: 08 October 2012 at 10:35 AM

    My advice is make sure that your University has a 'transfer policy' in place by the time you come to sit the Viva examination. I sat my progression examination having registered for an MPhil at the University of the West of England (Bristol) and requested that I be examined at PhD level to proceed with my research studies. I wasn't aware that policy changes were in progress.

    The Viva examination (3.5 hours, and 6,500 word report) was successful and my examiners made the recommendation (documented) that I should proceed to PhD. A research degrees committee sat '9 months' later and stated that it was 'not possible' to proceed / transfer from MPhil to PhD at UWE. They conveniently waited for the Independent Examiner to retire before informing me of the committees decision and in the mean time updated the Regulations.

    Given that I already hold two Masters Degrees and a Diploma in Management, I feel cheated. Neither my examiners nor the faculty research executives were aware of policy changes that served to limit my research opportunities. Furthermore, the lack of an apology and credible executive support has done little to restore 'trust and confidence' in research administrative competence.

    Ironically, the University Regulations permit a Research Council funded PhD registered student to fall back to MPhil, which seems to be biased in favour of funding related decision making policy and outcome statistics.

Please log in to post a comment.

Have your say

You need to be a registered user to join the discussion. Once you're logged in you'll be able to Create an article and Comment on existing articles
Sign up or login to get started

Latest activity

"My advice is make sure that your University has a 'transfer policy' in place by the time you come to sit the Viva examination. I sat my pro..."

D Shotton - 223 days ago

Read More Comments